Removing the VIM browse patch.

The general reasoning is that the vim browse patch is very invasive,
has a high level of complexity, and is incompatible with a significant
number of other patches and it complicates further maintenance.

Additionally the patch has its own scrollback mechanism which seemingly
did not work properly - and nobody seems to have complained about this
since the patch was added back in May 2021.

If you want to try out the vim browse patch then I would recommend having
a play around with the patch author's own build that has this patch
integrated:
   - https://github.com/juliusHuelsmann/st-history-vim
   - https://github.com/juliusHuelsmann/st

Alternatively a tag has been added to this repository that refers to the
last commit that still has the vim browse patch:
   - https://github.com/bakkeby/st-flexipatch/tree/VIM_BROWSE_PATCH
This commit is contained in:
Bakkeby 2024-03-07 22:35:11 +01:00
parent 340caa5d0a
commit e88f2bf20c
13 changed files with 40 additions and 938 deletions

8
st.h
View file

@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
#define MAX(a, b) ((a) < (b) ? (b) : (a))
#define LEN(a) (sizeof(a) / sizeof(a)[0])
#define BETWEEN(x, a, b) ((a) <= (x) && (x) <= (b))
#if VIM_BROWSE_PATCH
#define OUT(x, a, b) ((a) <= (x) || (x) <= (b))
#endif // VIM_BROWSE_PATCH
#define DIVCEIL(n, d) (((n) + ((d) - 1)) / (d))
#define DEFAULT(a, b) (a) = (a) ? (a) : (b)
#define LIMIT(x, a, b) (x) = (x) < (a) ? (a) : (x) > (b) ? (b) : (x)
@ -164,7 +161,7 @@ typedef struct {
typedef struct {
int row; /* nb row */
int col; /* nb col */
#if COLUMNS_PATCH && !VIM_BROWSE_PATCH
#if COLUMNS_PATCH
int maxcol;
#endif // COLUMNS_PATCH
Line *line; /* screen */
@ -341,9 +338,6 @@ int tattrset(int);
int tisaltscr(void);
void tnew(int, int);
void tresize(int, int);
#if VIM_BROWSE_PATCH
void tmoveto(int x, int y);
#endif // VIM_BROWSE_PATCH
void tsetdirtattr(int);
void ttyhangup(void);
int ttynew(const char *, char *, const char *, char **);